Universal SGI disk solution: 15kRPM 300GB SCA SCSI drives

[indigofan]

Most likely you are running into the issue from forcing Single-Ended (SE) mode on a Low Voltage Differential (LVD) bus.

The SCSI architecture for the Fuel should be running at least Ultra160 LVD (if not more). These are Low Voltage Differential signalling buses. Now for many SCSI adapters (that also have interactive firmware, like Adaptec). You could FORCE an LVD bus back into the Parallel SE mode. This is what 50-pin (Narrow) and 68-pin (Wide/Ultra-Wide) are. You CANNOT mix the two, a SCSI chain runs at the slowest bus standard of all devices present on it. So if you put an LVD device and an SE device on the same chain...they both need to run as SE (good luck with that in practice).

However (regardless of SGI), I've seen embedded SCSI controllers for servers that were LVD-only and absolutely threw a fit when you tried ANY SE devices. They hated it, refused to do it, and generally were considered LVD only. I assume the last SGIs were configured this way.

The adapter you got IS SE. Because it has 50 pin, this isn't an issue with active termination of the 68->50 pins...you're attempting to downgrade the actual SCSI signaling standard to an obsolete one (in terms of the Fuel's perspective).

You need to be use something like this: https://cs-electronics.com/product/...se-for-ultra23-and-ultra160320-1-form-factor/

Please note the need for this kind of thing is RARE, the need to change a SCA drive to Ultra160/320 68 pin connector was just was never an expected thing. So I understand your issues, but while SCA drives are cheap, that's not what the Fuel takes (which is odd, considering the other SGIs DO take them). So be extremely careful not to mix SCSI standards. You won't blow up anything, but you're forcing the controller to a whole other signalling protocol...and even thought it should work, I'm not surprised it's throwing a fit. Many Ultra SCSI controllers were not really tested for SE and many either have intermittent problems or just outright refuse to work on an old SE device.

My advise, either buy a normal Ultra160 HDD (or get the right adapter, if you can) and then put in a AHA-2940UW card in the FUEL to run external and internal SE devices off that card. (since that's the correct standard for that adaptec card).

I've seen entire SCSI LVD array enclosures that worked ONLY on LVD and any SE devices caused firmware crashes. It's a thing.

I'm going to try and reuse the adaptor in an Indigo, got it plugged into a 10K drive, and now the machine glows a glorious Green (hurray) but awaiting a monitor to see what's going on and or a serial cable to get to the next step in resurrecting an IRIS Indigo R4K.

 

[siliboi]

Is it possible to connect a 300gb to the back of an o2. Like the one elf uses? I was going to use some kind of scsi 3 cable to a 68-80 adapter. What cable would I use and what adapter should I get. Im quite confused about what cable works on the back of an o2 i assume female to female scsi 3 of some type about 3ft long would work?

 

[Elf]

Edit: With apologies, I no longer wish to have involvement with SGUG or SGI communities in general,
and have also chosen to remove all of my content. Many things have changed since I co-founded, named, and ultimately
then left SGUG. There are many good people around, to whom I apologize for frustrating by removing these things, and
also many petty people that over the years whittled down both the enjoyment as well as sense of obligation I used to
feel to anyone else regarding what was ultimately just a hobby. Unfortunately one of the latter now writes the rules
and so it is time for me to take my things and go.

This message will replace all of my previous forum posts because deleting threads that I started would have removed
other peoples' posts.

 

[siliboi]

The O2 has a HD68 external SCSI-II connector on back; one could certainly attach an external SCSI enclosure containing one of the 15kRPM 300GB drives.

I would find an external SCSI enclosure that also has a HD68 connector on the back, and use an internal SCA to 68 pin adapter to connect the drive inside the enclosure. The cable between the enclosure and the O2 would then just be a regular HD68 to HD68 SCSI cable.

You may also need a terminator for the second port of the external SCSI enclosure, so I would pick one up as well if it does not offer built-in termination.

For reference see the O2 Workstation Hardware Reference Guide: Connecting External SCSI Devices.

Any recommended enclosures or cables or websites where I can buy/ links?

 

[Elf]

Edit: With apologies, I no longer wish to have involvement with SGUG or SGI communities in general,
and have also chosen to remove all of my content. Many things have changed since I co-founded, named, and ultimately
then left SGUG. There are many good people around, to whom I apologize for frustrating by removing these things, and
also many petty people that over the years whittled down both the enjoyment as well as sense of obligation I used to
feel to anyone else regarding what was ultimately just a hobby. Unfortunately one of the latter now writes the rules
and so it is time for me to take my things and go.

This message will replace all of my previous forum posts because deleting threads that I started would have removed
other peoples' posts.

 

[Elf]

Edit: With apologies, I no longer wish to have involvement with SGUG or SGI communities in general,
and have also chosen to remove all of my content. Many things have changed since I co-founded, named, and ultimately
then left SGUG. There are many good people around, to whom I apologize for frustrating by removing these things, and
also many petty people that over the years whittled down both the enjoyment as well as sense of obligation I used to
feel to anyone else regarding what was ultimately just a hobby. Unfortunately one of the latter now writes the rules
and so it is time for me to take my things and go.

This message will replace all of my previous forum posts because deleting threads that I started would have removed
other peoples' posts.

 

[Elf]

Edit: With apologies, I no longer wish to have involvement with SGUG or SGI communities in general,
and have also chosen to remove all of my content. Many things have changed since I co-founded, named, and ultimately
then left SGUG. There are many good people around, to whom I apologize for frustrating by removing these things, and
also many petty people that over the years whittled down both the enjoyment as well as sense of obligation I used to
feel to anyone else regarding what was ultimately just a hobby. Unfortunately one of the latter now writes the rules
and so it is time for me to take my things and go.

This message will replace all of my previous forum posts because deleting threads that I started would have removed
other peoples' posts.

 

[weblacky]

I won't go and fetch it but I remember Google doing a HDD study for a few years on HDD failure rates. While they had their favs and such, the conclusion was...dramatic increase in failure rates for drives continuously OVER 70F and for every 10F additional like a 50% chance of failure, increase.

Granted you need REALLY aggressive cooling to achieve 70F on these old drives...but once you're really too hot to hold in the hand...too hot (really). Now of course if you're just booting these for fun, occasionally, who cares. if you're actually going run them for 1 hour plus...then nope...get an SSD or a modem (slower) drive with high density to turn down the rotation speeds (or sleep aggressively).

 

[Elf]

Edit: With apologies, I no longer wish to have involvement with SGUG or SGI communities in general,
and have also chosen to remove all of my content. Many things have changed since I co-founded, named, and ultimately
then left SGUG. There are many good people around, to whom I apologize for frustrating by removing these things, and
also many petty people that over the years whittled down both the enjoyment as well as sense of obligation I used to
feel to anyone else regarding what was ultimately just a hobby. Unfortunately one of the latter now writes the rules
and so it is time for me to take my things and go.

This message will replace all of my previous forum posts because deleting threads that I started would have removed
other peoples' posts.

 

[weblacky]

Which is why I used the term "very aggressive cooling", because most people run 72F temps (I run 65F-68F) in their homes. Regardless, that was the statement and I already headed it off at the pass by qualifying it.

But I'll reiterate, 70F is considered perfect, but that's costly. But once it's uncomfortably hot to hold in your hand, that's bad territory.

 

[Elf]

Edit: With apologies, I no longer wish to have involvement with SGUG or SGI communities in general,
and have also chosen to remove all of my content. Many things have changed since I co-founded, named, and ultimately
then left SGUG. There are many good people around, to whom I apologize for frustrating by removing these things, and
also many petty people that over the years whittled down both the enjoyment as well as sense of obligation I used to
feel to anyone else regarding what was ultimately just a hobby. Unfortunately one of the latter now writes the rules
and so it is time for me to take my things and go.

This message will replace all of my previous forum posts because deleting threads that I started would have removed
other peoples' posts.

 

[Elf]

Edit: With apologies, I no longer wish to have involvement with SGUG or SGI communities in general,
and have also chosen to remove all of my content. Many things have changed since I co-founded, named, and ultimately
then left SGUG. There are many good people around, to whom I apologize for frustrating by removing these things, and
also many petty people that over the years whittled down both the enjoyment as well as sense of obligation I used to
feel to anyone else regarding what was ultimately just a hobby. Unfortunately one of the latter now writes the rules
and so it is time for me to take my things and go.

This message will replace all of my previous forum posts because deleting threads that I started would have removed
other peoples' posts.

 

[gijoe77]

get an SSD or a modem (slower) drive with high density to turn down the rotation speeds (or sleep aggressively).

That's the core issue - we would all be using SSD's if there was a way to do it for under $2k for the SATA-to-SCSI adapter - but for just SCSI, the 300GB drives are the biggest and fastest we are gonna be able to use. For Indy or slower 5.3 (or below) systems SD2SCSI works fine - but the performance of the SD2SCSI takes a significant hit once we do Indigo2 running 6.5. The 10MB/sec (theoretical) cap of the SD2SCSI makes it not ideal for anything past Indigo2

 

[weblacky]

Yeah, I do hear you, I've been collecting long enough that I have those things back when they were cheap, 11+ years ago. For my needs today on new systems I've picked up since then. I'd take Ian's advice and just get nice, cool running Fujitsu SCSI drives for your SCA80 needs (at least those really do run cool and are cheap on ebay).

Everyone is waiting for the next cheap(er) SCSI emulation thing. Personally I think we'll be waiting a VERY LONG time on SGIs as most people believe SCSI is for 80's PC and runs like 10-15 MiB/s while SGIs, SUNs, and some other UNIX workstations were so expensive back then they never entered the consumer market and the vast majority of SCSI emulation projects today are targeted to very slow, consumer, appliances. SGIs were supercars and you still need a supercar drive (of the right vintage) to let them cruise on the freeway.

The vast majority of my collection is still on mechanical drives. But I reserve the good stuff for the last stations (like Tezro), anything else I'd throw a fujitsu in and leave it. It's only worth an SSD on a Ultra160 or higher bus. A mechanical drive of the early 2000's can keep up with an 80MiB/s or slower bus without hiccup. The problem is that LOW DENSITY 10K-15K drives pour out the hot and cook. So the message was either find a solid state solution you like or get a larger (146GB-300GB) drive (which doesn't need to run so fast) given the density and head movement for the same throughput and use that.

People keep trying to use like 36GB 15K seagate drives...we're just reminding you to stop that on SGI stations...SGI servers...yes, sure they have the noise and airflow to cool those drive (rack mount SGIs are fine). Most SGI stations turned down the fans for user comfort...therefore stop using drives that require cooling by their own manual's instructions.

It's that simple, but since we all own our stuff, you can try whatever you want, we're just warning you as we've been there and seen that 20 years ago.

 

[gijoe77]

yeah ok, your arguement sounds perfectly reasonable.

I know some PC users put fans and heatsinks on their HDD's - but they have room inside their towers. I was thinking about hacking an extra fan into some SGI's - I think it's doable, but I don't know if that extra effort makes sense or if just having a backup drive that gets mirrored every now and then is a better solution.

 

[glitchwrks]

I end up running SCA drives in external boxes for most of my Sun systems, the Sun UniDisk box is pretty nice for this, though it can still have heat issues with very hot drives. Bonus, you get automatic narrow/wide termination. I haven't bought them in a long time as I have several, but they used to be cheap-ish.

 

[epitaxial]

In regards to using these adapters on a Fuel. They are missing a line that enables the drive. I made one work by using a trim pot to get the required potential. Maybe dividing 5 volts down to 3.3? There was some info about this posted to the other defunct forum.

 

[Elf]

Edit: With apologies, I no longer wish to have involvement with SGUG or SGI communities in general,
and have also chosen to remove all of my content. Many things have changed since I co-founded, named, and ultimately
then left SGUG. There are many good people around, to whom I apologize for frustrating by removing these things, and
also many petty people that over the years whittled down both the enjoyment as well as sense of obligation I used to
feel to anyone else regarding what was ultimately just a hobby. Unfortunately one of the latter now writes the rules
and so it is time for me to take my things and go.

This message will replace all of my previous forum posts because deleting threads that I started would have removed
other peoples' posts.

 

[epitaxial]

Doing some reading it looks like it's pin 38 RMT-START. Some boards look like they have a jumper for that option but mine didn't even a trace going to the pin. I was never sure if the input for that was 5v tolerant so I decided to be safe and use 3.3. The input is likely safe to use 5 volts on so in that case you could use an adjacent pin and a small jumper wire.

 

[toncho11]

Hi,

There is also the option to use an 80 pin SCSI to 50 pins SCSI (no 68 pins).
I am planning to use a SCSI 80 pins Maxtor Ultra320 SCSI HDD attached to the 50 pin SCSI cable.
Available here: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005003411966474.html
But maybe smaller is not better for the cable?